Tu Quoque Fallacy

Deflecting criticism by pointing out similar behavior in the critic ("you too" argument)

What is the Tu Quoque Fallacy?

The Tu Quoque fallacy (pronounced "too kwoh-kway" and Latin for "you also") occurs when someone attempts to defend themselves against criticism by turning the same criticism back on their accuser. It's essentially saying, "You can't criticize me for X because you do X too." This fallacy attempts to discredit the opponent's argument based on their actions rather than addressing the argument itself.

In sales contexts, this fallacy often appears when prospects deflect concerns about their current solutions or processes by pointing out perceived flaws or inconsistencies in your offering or company.

Examples in Sales Contexts

Example 1: Efficiency Improvements

Scenario: A sales representative points out inefficiencies in a prospect's current process.

Sales Rep: "Our solution could help reduce the manual data entry that's currently taking up so much of your team's time."

Prospect: "Well, your own onboarding process requires manual data entry too, so you're not really one to talk about efficiency."

Instead of addressing whether the solution would actually improve their efficiency, the prospect deflects by pointing out a perceived similar issue with the sales rep's company.

Example 2: Customer Service Quality

Scenario: A sales representative discusses improving customer service response times.

Sales Rep: "Our platform could help reduce your customer service response times from 24 hours to under 2 hours."

Prospect: "I had to wait three days to get a response from your sales team when I first inquired, so I don't think you're in a position to lecture us about response times."

The prospect is avoiding evaluating the solution's benefits by pointing out perceived hypocrisy.

How to Counter the Tu Quoque Fallacy

  1. Acknowledge and validate: "I understand your concern about our onboarding process. That's a fair point, and it's something we're actively working to improve. Would you like to hear how we're addressing that?"
  2. Refocus on value: "You're right to bring that up, and I apologize for that experience. Regardless of our past interaction, the question remains: would reducing your team's response time from 24 hours to 2 hours create value for your business?"
  3. Separate the messenger from the message: "I understand your frustration. Even if we haven't been perfect in this area, the solution itself has helped companies like yours reduce response times by over 90%. Would that kind of improvement be valuable to you?"
  4. Use third-party validation: "That's a fair criticism. What might be more relevant than my company's performance is how our current customers have experienced improvements. Would you be interested in speaking with Company X about how they've reduced their response times?"

Why Sales Professionals Should Care

Understanding the Tu Quoque fallacy is important for sales professionals because:

Conclusion

The Tu Quoque fallacy can derail sales conversations by shifting focus from the prospect's needs to perceived inconsistencies in your offering or company. By recognizing this fallacy, sales professionals can acknowledge valid concerns while redirecting the conversation to the value proposition at hand. Remember that the goal isn't to win an argument about who is more consistent, but to determine whether your solution can genuinely help the prospect solve their problems. Addressing Tu Quoque arguments with empathy, transparency, and a focus on customer outcomes will help you navigate these challenging conversations effectively.

Key Takeaway

When faced with a Tu Quoque argument, acknowledge any valid points, take responsibility where appropriate, and then gently refocus the conversation on how your solution can address the prospect's specific needs regardless of perceived inconsistencies.