Concession Trading
Leverage strategic concessions to create mutual value and close deals effectively and efficiently
Introduction
Concession Trading is a structured negotiation technique in which both parties exchange value deliberately—giving something to get something. Unlike unilateral discounting, concession trading ensures that every adjustment, price reduction, or added feature strengthens the relationship while protecting margins.
For AEs, SDRs, and sales managers, this technique matters because it keeps control of the conversation. It prevents reactive giveaways, positions you as a disciplined negotiator, and communicates professionalism. This article defines concession trading, explores its psychology, explains its mechanics, and provides tactical guidance for applying it ethically in both B2B and B2C sales contexts.
Historical Background
The practice of trading concessions originates from classical bargaining theory, documented in early economic literature on reciprocal exchange (Walton & McKersie, 1965). In industrial and labor negotiations, concession trading evolved as a principle of reciprocity fairness—each side making controlled, proportional moves.
Modern sales professionals adapted the concept during the 1980s consultative selling movement. As sales shifted from transactional to value-based, ethical concession trading replaced arbitrary discounting. The focus moved from “giving ground” to balancing value.
Psychological Foundations
Together, these cognitive patterns explain why structured, reciprocal movement creates more durable agreements than unilateral discounting.
Core Concept and Mechanism
What It Is
Concession trading means exchanging value deliberately—“If I do X, can you do Y?”—rather than giving discounts or extras without return. It reframes negotiation as collaboration rather than competition.
How It Works Step-by-Step
Ethical vs. Manipulative Use
Ethical concession trading clarifies mutual gain; manipulative tactics pressure or obscure value.
Practical Application: How to Use It
Step-by-Step Playbook
Example Phrasing
Mini-Script Example
Buyer: Can you lower the price by 10%?
AE: I appreciate that. If we adjusted price, could you commit to the two-year contract instead of one?
Buyer: Possibly—let me check with finance.
AE: Great. That would help us justify the discount internally while locking in your rate longer term.
Table: Concession Trading in Practice
| Situation | Prompt line | Why it works | Risk to watch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyer asks for a discount | “If I reduce the price, can you confirm a longer contract?” | Creates reciprocity and reinforces value | May seem transactional if rapport is weak |
| Procurement stalls | “If we can expedite legal, I’ll include onboarding credits.” | Trades speed for added value | Avoid overpromising internal timelines |
| Add-on request | “We can include that feature if we move to the pro tier.” | Connects cost to value | Ensure buyer sees benefit, not penalty |
| Late-stage hesitation | “If we finalize this week, I’ll add two extra seats.” | Encourages momentum | Can seem like deadline pressure if tone is off |
Real-World Examples
B2C Scenario: Auto Sales
A customer hesitates on a premium trim model, asking for a $1,000 reduction. The salesperson replies, “If I match that, can we wrap financing today?” The buyer agrees. The dealership preserves urgency, completes financing same day, and offsets the concession through faster turnover.
Outcome: The buyer feels treated fairly, while the dealer maintains profitability.
B2B Scenario: SaaS Contract
A procurement officer requests a 15% discount. The AE responds, “I can propose 10% if we expand to three user departments instead of one.” The buyer escalates approval and closes at 12%—but triple the scope.
Outcome: The company protects margin, increases footprint, and maintains trust.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Advanced Variations and Modern Use Cases
Digital and Subscription Models
In SaaS, concession trading often occurs through feature gating, seat expansion, or tier adjustments rather than pure discounting.
Example phrasing:
Consultative Selling
Concession trading can be reframed as collaborative prioritization—jointly deciding which outcomes justify which investments. This strengthens trust and positions the rep as a partner.
Cross-Cultural Notes
Conclusion
Concession Trading is a discipline of fairness and control. It transforms negotiation from “price battles” into value exchange. When used ethically, it strengthens relationships, protects margins, and signals professionalism.
Used poorly, it looks like bribery or panic. The difference lies in preparation, tone, and timing.
Actionable takeaway: Never give without getting. Trade consciously, document clearly, and let reciprocity build trust—not pressure.
Checklist: Do This / Avoid This
FAQ
Q1: When does concession trading backfire?
When trades are imbalanced or feel punitive. It must appear collaborative and fair.
Q2: Is concession trading only for price discussions?
No. It applies to delivery terms, service levels, access, or timing—any negotiable value.
Q3: How do I train a team to use it well?
Role-play realistic give-get exchanges. Evaluate tone, pacing, and fairness perception.
References
Related Elements
Last updated: 2025-12-01
